Select Page

How to save money over multi-pulse and active front-end drives

Active Front End Drives

The 6-pulse drive with Matrix AP harmonic filter outperformed the AFE drive in the following important areas: Harmonic performance under balanced line conditions: 2-9% better THID performance for loads 25-75% and similar performance (about 4% THID) at 100% load.

Harmonic performance under line imbalance conditions: Significantly better performance. For example, under 3% line voltage imbalances performance was 28.8% better (26.3% vs. 44.3% THID) at 25% load, and 6% better (12.3% vs. 18.3% THID) at 50% load.

Power Factor: Similar performance for loads 50-100%. Equal performance at 25% load and 3% voltage imbalance.* (*The Matrix AP harmonic filter exhibited a reduced leading power factor under light loads. While advantageous in some circumstances, a capacitor contactor option may be used to remove the filter capacitors from the circuit and eliminate this condition.)

Power Loss: The losses of a low horsepower AFE drive vs. a typical 6-pulse drive equipped with a Matrix AP filter is about 15%.  However, the losses for a typical 1000 horsepower AFE vs. a 6-pulse drive with a Matrix AP filter drive are double.

A 6-pulse drive with a Matrix AP harmonic filter has a number of additional benefits over the AFE drive: smaller equipment size, lower price, shortened lead time, and increased availability of drives and corresponding replacement parts.

 

18-Pulse Drives

The 6-Pulse drive with Matrix AP harmonic filter outperformed the 18-pulse drive in the following technical specifications:

Power Loss Reduction: 40% – 73% depending on the size of the VFD and the component manufacturer.

Overall efficiency: 0.5% more efficient (99.0% vs. 98.5%).

Harmonic performance under balanced line conditions: 1-2% better THID performance for loads 25-75% and equal performance for loads greater than 75%.

Harmonic performance under line imbalance conditions: Significantly better performance. For example under 3% line imbalance, performance was 32.5% better (17.5% vs 50% THID) at 25% load and 13% better (12% vs 25% THID) at 50% load.

Power Factor: Better to equal performance for loads 50-100%.*

* The Matrix AP harmonic filter exhibited a reduced leading power factor under light loads. While advantageous in some circumstances, a capacitor contactor option may be used to remove the filter capacitors from the circuit and eliminate this condition.

A 6-pulse drive with a Matrix AP harmonic filter has a number of additional benefits over the 18-pulse drive: smaller equipment size and weight, lower price, and shortened lead time/increased availability of drives and corresponding replacement parts.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.